Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MSCPP Beta 0.1
#51
Building and compiling takes forever O___O, what's your resolve for this?
Reply
#52
What compiler are you using?
Reply
#53
GIAKEN Wrote:What compiler are you using?

VS Express
Reply
#54
Tony Wrote:
GIAKEN Wrote:What compiler are you using?

VS Express


Grab a copy of Dev C++
Quote:Robin:
Why aren't maps and shit loaded up in a dynamic array?
Jacob:
the 4 people that know how are lazy
Robin:
Who are those 4 people?
Jacob:
um
you, me, and 2 others?
Reply
#55
dev c++ is pretty bad...

I would say vs express is actually quite a good compiler.

I haven't tested compile times, but it might just be using a lot of header files or something. C++ takes a lot longer to compile then vb because there is less standard.
Reply
#56
Dev-C++ is the only compiler I have ever used. It's really nice.
Reply
#57
I was using dev C++ for one of my secret projects, but I decided it wasnt good enough. I did some research and people said vs express was pretty good so I tried it, and really think it is much better.

I also tried codeblocks which was pretty good.
Reply
#58
I used Visual Studio Team System 2008 for developing, but it IS 100% compatible with VS 2008 Express.
Reply
#59
I also use Dev-C++
Reply
#60
hows the progress? i really doubt this will port to VB6 unless you use something like visual C++ 6, yet alone its almost unbearingly impossible to convert VB6 to VB.net, not only that but if you are using a winsock library, it will make this so much more confusing for the protocol to read such as this example:

TCPClient(VB6 in WinSock) -----> String of Bytes Encoded and Sent -------------> Package Of Bytes Decoded In UTF8 or w/e you use ----> Visual C++ Server(System.Net.Sockets) String is messed up.

If you see what I mean, I mean .NET is different then the old Visual Studio 6 package, so there could be some broke Bytes when decoded.

And as well as that i'm sorry for the necro.

Regards,
Rydinophor
Reply
#61
C++ isn't a .net language.. O.o
Reply
#62
Progress is very slow.
And I'm using pure c++, not visual c++. I'm using Visual STUDIO, for DEVELOPMENT only. Even if I was, there are conversion procedures.
Reply
#63
much better, so are you using codeblocks, bloodshed(Dev-C++), or custom? GCC, MingW, or custom compiler or different?
If I could get those answers I'd be ready to download the software to my computer and wait until its in beta.
Reply
#64
Dragoons Master Wrote:I'm using Visual STUDIO, for DEVELOPMENT only.

http://www.microsoft.com/express/vc/
Reply
#65
yeah I know, I have that, the intellisense sucks terrible on it, if you type in a lower case letter to find the library it will give you an error, for instance: "system::" won't display compared to "System::", thats why i would rather use VB.net or VC# Tongue.
Reply
#66
I would rather have notepad++, then you don't have to worry about intellisense or a clunky gde at all Big Grin

Codeblocks is nice if you're coding cross platform.. If you're windows only than that visual studio is probably the way to go.
Reply
#67
You're all retarded. IDE is all about Taste, If you like an IDE you dont have to force it on Other people.
I used Dev-C++, Visual Studio Express and Code::Blocks and Programmer's Notepad and a bunch of others.
By my Experience Visual Studio is the Best IDE currently, and Visual C++ is the best Windows Compiler (In comparison of Features to the other compilers).
But i still stick to Code::Blocks because i like it, Thats it. I also use MinGW because i like the feel of using GCC.
This war has nothing to do with Sides.

Except Visual C++ 6.0 because even though the IDE is awesome everyone agrees it's complete shit.
So yeah, Just pick a Compiler and IDE that are Standard Compliant enough.
Reply
#68
katcode Wrote:You're all retarded. IDE is all about Taste, If you like an IDE you dont have to force it on Other people.
I used Dev-C++, Visual Studio Express and Code::Blocks and Programmer's Notepad and a bunch of others.
By my Experience Visual Studio is the Best IDE currently, and Visual C++ is the best Windows Compiler (In comparison of Features to the other compilers).
But i still stick to Code::Blocks because i like it, Thats it. I also use MinGW because i like the feel of using GCC.
This war has nothing to do with Sides.

Except Visual C++ 6.0 because even though the IDE is awesome everyone agrees it's complete shit.
So yeah, Just pick a Compiler and IDE that are Standard Compliant enough.

You're about 2 weeks too late on this. Shut up.
Reply
#69
Is this still being developed. I am slowly learning C++ and have been waiting to use this. Please update us Dragoons master
Reply
#70
It will be done, someday, but my grad is just making me nutz. I'm 5:37 AM and I'm still awake... too many things to be done already. I'm practically out of time...
Reply
#71
Ok then. Was only asking cause im learning to do C++ programming.
Reply
#72
No problem ^^
Still 7:52 AM and I did not came back home to sleep. Still at university.
Reply
#73
Do you have a repository setup for this yet or is it just the download at the start of this thread for the latest?
Reply
#74
Just download. No repository. Need time to finish things.
At least now I KNOW when I'll have time Big Grin
My Scientific Initiation will be over by December. By there, I'll have lot's of free time! WEE!!!
Reply
#75
Dragoons Master Wrote:Just download. No repository. Need time to finish things.
At least now I KNOW when I'll have time Big Grin
My Scientific Initiation will be over by December. By there, I'll have lot's of free time! WEE!!!


Well I don't know what the heck you are talking about but Congrats! Looking forward to seeing more of your work as well as helping to make this a much better than any previous version of MS!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)