![]() |
Redundant? - Printable Version +- Mirage Source (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums) +-- Forum: Mirage Source (Nostalgia) (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=61) +--- Forum: Archive (2006-2011) (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +---- Forum: Source Code Development (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +----- Forum: Mirage Source 4 (Visual Basic 6) (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=44) +----- Thread: Redundant? (/showthread.php?tid=2465) |
Redundant? - Nean - 01-01-2009 Code: Private Sub chkServerLog_Click() Wouldn't it be simpler to just see if it's checked, rather than toggle a boolean when it's checked? Rather than seeing if the ServerLog = True or false, why not just have it as Code: If frmserver.chkserverlog.value = 1 Then Am I missing something obvious? Re: Redundant? - Matt - 01-01-2009 It's less code in the long run, if you think about it. I'd rather just check a single boolean (I prefer to use a byte..) than have to type all that out each time. Re: Redundant? - Labmonkey - 01-01-2009 Less code in vb6 doesn't actually mean its faster. But really, it will make such an insignificant difference. Just ignore it. Re: Redundant? - Matt - 01-01-2009 Who said anything about speed? I'm just lazy. Lol. Re: Redundant? - Nean - 01-01-2009 Hmmm. Alright, just trying to learn good habits for programming. Figured, I'd ask you guys. Thanks! Re: Redundant? - GIAKEN - 01-01-2009 You know to reduce that to a single line? Code: Private Sub chkServerLog_Click() |