28-03-2009, 03:25 AM
I don't know but still this whole topic was one big pointless argument.
Easy to Make Security System
|
28-03-2009, 03:25 AM
I don't know but still this whole topic was one big pointless argument.
28-03-2009, 03:26 AM
GIAKEN Wrote:I don't know but still this whole topic was one big pointless argument. I wasn't trying to argue. Fox took it upon himself to repeat himself over and over again, never letting anything anyone else said sink in. He acted as if we all thought it were a good idea to do it. We all know it's not. We just stated that it COULD be done, although it would fuck up a lot of things. *shrugs* I really think a mod should lock this.
29-03-2009, 02:19 PM
I think client-side AI would not be a bad idea.
29-03-2009, 07:37 PM
Well your opinion doesn't count.
29-03-2009, 08:18 PM
KruSuPhy Wrote:Well your opinion doesn't count. It does, actually.
29-03-2009, 10:22 PM
No.
Yours doesn't count, either.
29-03-2009, 10:33 PM
KruSuPhy Wrote:No. You're a noob here, so I'll overlook your idiocy for now. Soon though, if you keep it up, I'll treat you the way I treat everyone else I don't like.
29-03-2009, 10:37 PM
If Im correct, Dragoon posted a proper AI tut, but it would be too "heavy" for the server to use. Moving a bit of the calculations client-side to reduce server-stress would not be that big of a deal, would it? With multiple people on the same map, server couldeven go as far as compare results, and with only 1 person on that map, the server can make some quick guesses what the best way is, check if 90% of those guesses are correct based on the client's AI results, and if not, take over AI itself.
Reduce stress on the server, multiple users doing the same calculations for increased security in populated areas, and single-users being "monitored" by what the server "thinks" is right, without any difficult calculations. Again, I don't say this is a great idea, it obviously has it's downfalls. But currently, MS ai is crap, and all tuts for upgrading exponentially increase server load. So this IS an option. It should not be swept off the table without discussion like Fox tried to do. Gg, ez as fuck. And Kru, Matt's an asshole, get used to it, just try to think about your posts and he'll leave you alone. He always leaves my posts alone when Im srs D:.
29-03-2009, 11:17 PM
Joost Wrote:And Kru, Matt's an asshole, get used to it, just try to think about your posts and he'll leave you alone. He always leaves my posts alone when Im srs D:. ![]()
30-03-2009, 12:15 AM
Matt Wrote:Okay, Asshole.KruSuPhy Wrote:No. Matt Wrote:You're a noob here,I've been here for a quite a while. I lurked these forums for forever before I actually signed up. I sat as an inactive for a while before I even posted an introduction, Too. Matt Wrote:I'll overlook your idiocy for now.If you're going to toss it out as idiocy, Be my guest. I think about every single post before I click the submit button, If you don't mind me saying. I said something that wasn't even directed at you, Wasn't even serious, and you answered to it. So I said something to YOU, Again, Not being serious, And you launched into Asshole mode. I don't give a shit what everyone else thinks, That makes me feel like you're the idiot. Matt Wrote:Soon though, if you keep it up, I'll treat you the way I treat everyone else I don't likeAm I supposed to care? Go ahead. Treat me like shit. Ask me if I give two fucks. I can laugh at your shit all day long. I'll admit, I do have an anger problem. Keep being an asshole to me, And I will eventually retaliate. It won't be the first ban I've gotten for arguing with some random prick over stupid shit because he had to get pissed over something stupid. Kay thanks.
30-03-2009, 12:27 AM
KruSuPhy Wrote:Matt Wrote:Okay, Asshole.KruSuPhy Wrote:No. Asshole mode? Fucker, I don't have a normal mode. This is all I got. ![]() Oh boo hoo, little bitch. You need to stop taking the internet so fucking seriously. You have an anger problem? Yay for you. I have one too, however, it's unaffected by the fucking internet.
30-03-2009, 02:00 AM
Locked.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|