![]() |
idea's for mse build 2 - Printable Version +- Mirage Engine (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums) +-- Forum: Mirage Source (Nostalgia) (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=61) +--- Forum: Archive (2006-2011) (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +---- Forum: Source Code Development (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +----- Forum: Mirage Source 3.x.x, MSx (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +----- Thread: idea's for mse build 2 (/showthread.php?tid=543) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: idea's for mse build 2 - Robin - 26-12-2006 lordgivemick Wrote:what kite said That bolded text should help you understand what I was saying a bit better. - GodSentDeath - 26-12-2006 If we're making it a performance upgrade, don't added dumb things like: --Visual Inventory --Bank --Emotions --Etc That's just upgrading it for the lazier people that don't want to learn shit all =) Basically, Elysium. But, if we are making a complete upgrade and adding all features possible, stay away from bugging the source, MAKE SURE EACH FEATURE WORKS 100% BEFORE MOVING ON!! A lot of engines have problems with that part ![]() Keep in mind, Mirage Source is a place for people to learn, Elysium is not. We aren't Elysium are we? I say we just keep the performance and security up, and the features down. I'm not bad mouthing Elysium btw =P It's just an example ![]() A good feature not mentioned which I could help with:: --New graphics engine I have an amazing engine which I have working at 100% and that uses different graphics files, png, jpg, gif, etc =) It has great FPS, which helps with the performance part =P - Obsidian - 27-12-2006 Heh, i'm also looking at revising my tileset system dave. I'm sure our methods are quite different, but it's definately something that needs to be done. As far as a new graphics system goes, do you mean the way that game is actually doing the drawings (loops and stuff)? or are you talking about using DX8? I was just wondering what specifically you meant by that GSD - Tony - 28-12-2006 one Wrote:my suggestions for mse2: Nah, there are tuts for it. Whats needed to be removed is player loosing experience which is simple. Revising everything is best. I'd say. :: Pando - Matt - 28-12-2006 Leave the npcs alone. If you alter the algo, then you could get it to calculate accordingly. Which would make npcs more correct, or balanced, if you will. - Dragoons Master - 28-12-2006 i think that maybe, MAYBE removing the speed atribute would be a good idea. Does anybody likes it??? Every one that playes my game HATES it and I'm going to remove it from my source soon. - Tony - 28-12-2006 Whats its purpose anyways? :: Pando - Robin - 28-12-2006 Don't you get something when you get 30 speed or something..? - Robin - 28-12-2006 That's about as stupid as having speed for helmets *rolls eyes* Maybe, just maybe, we should remove the current attributes, and release the source with a tutorial for adding them in? Because I spent ages removing them when I got the source... Or one source with and one without. - Matt - 28-12-2006 If you use the default system for stat points, every ten speed, will give you one extra stat point per level. So if you have 10 speed or less, you get 1 point, 20 or less, you get 2, etc, etc. - Misunderstood - 28-12-2006 Kite Wrote:That's about as stupid as having speed for helmets *rolls eyes* We don't need any more versions :roll: - Forte - 31-12-2006 My post prob dosnt mean anything butttt i say; Make it a blank MS but just add bugfixes and etc. It shouldnt have features cause that just kills it all and turns it into an engine. - TheRealDamien - 01-01-2007 You guys need to stop with the "add in the upper features" shit... if there is anything to add/edit it should be speed upgrades and nothing else. I spend a whole year on just rewriting my packet system and massive upgrades to security and other speed upgrades and tweaks. Then and only then did I ever begin to add in any feature crap. - Matt - 01-01-2007 Dude, who said to add features? I see everyone saying NOT to add features in. - Joost - 01-01-2007 Advocate Wrote:Dude, who said to add features? I see everyone saying NOT to add features in.He wants to look really smart by pretending he came up with that himself. Just ignore it, eventually you'll get used to it. - Matt - 01-01-2007 I have him blocked on MSN, have for awhile now. I'm pretty sure he's the one that messaged me and asked me why I was using MS, saying it was pure crap, that there was no way you could make it hold more than 10 players, etc, etc. Anyways, I'm going to stop now, before the thread gets too off topic. - Rian - 01-01-2007 TheRealDamien Wrote:I spend a whole year on just rewriting my packet system and massive upgrades to security and other speed upgrades and tweaks. Yet, spell animations is too hard for you to tackle? - TheRealDamien - 02-01-2007 Incase you didnt read on another topic I got that done its just once I added it in the source messed up but now ive fixed the problem. As for the Advocate I did say that and the reason I said that is because it would be better to to complete scrap mirage source and start over... I mean pratically everything needs to be rewrote... Anyway thats my personal opinion on the matter. - Tony - 02-01-2007 Damien your naturally to be hated. :] Even on MS you make some crappy ass bull shit stuff saying your so smart. Be real, stop being a jackass. P.S. I bet my 5 week knowledge could pwn your bs lies. kthxbye. - Liz - 02-01-2007 TheRealDamien Wrote:Incase you didnt read on another topic I got that done its just once I added it in the source messed up but now ive fixed the problem. Darned source code, just going and messing up, all on its own. - TheRealDamien - 02-01-2007 Well... for a few pointers.. 1. mirage source users up 100% CPU (this requires 40 to 60% of the graphic system to be rewrote. 2. mirage source needs almost 80% of the walking/running system rewrote because of the lag/flaw problems. 3. mirage source would require around 80% rewrite of everything just to get a stable product. Those are facts... that I hope william will fix/sort. So pando you were saying? - GodSentDeath - 02-01-2007 1: Your CPU must suck -_- I NEVER get that high of numbers. Ever. 2: Lag? what? I know of a couple little flaws that don't matter too much at all. 3: The product is stable. Name all of the "80%" of things that needs to be rewritten. - Tony - 02-01-2007 TheRealDamien Wrote:Well... for a few pointers.. I hope you read what I said before I edited, Damien. ![]() d i e. :: Pando - GodSentDeath - 02-01-2007 Ok Pando that's just too far -_- No more flaming past this post... any flame post will be removed =) - Tony - 02-01-2007 Ah okay. I removed it. Even though I hate his guts. :: Pando |