![]() |
Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Printable Version +- Mirage Source (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums) +-- Forum: Mirage Source (Nostalgia) (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=61) +--- Forum: Archive (2006-2011) (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +---- Forum: Source Code Development (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +----- Forum: Mirage Source 4 (Visual Basic 6) (https://mirage-engine.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=44) +----- Thread: Better GetTickCount Alternative? (/showthread.php?tid=2624) |
Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Nean - 16-03-2009 http://gpwiki.org/index.php/VB:Tutorials:WINAPI:Timers Thought some of you might find that interesting, especially since Matt was having problems with GetTickCount, and had to convert to something else. Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - William - 16-03-2009 It's good reading but not usefull in a Msource. We always check if the time is more than; but if we would want to use equal to - this would be a good idea ![]() And also, I didn't know TickCount was so unprecise ![]() Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Matt - 16-03-2009 Verrigan's method is super precise. Down to the nanoseconds. Lol. It doesn't mess up the system if it loops to a negative number either. Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - William - 16-03-2009 Your refering to his dbltickcount? Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Doomy - 16-03-2009 Matt Wrote:Verrigan's method is super precise. Down to the nanoseconds. Lol. It doesn't mess up the system if it loops to a negative number either.who is this verrigan i always hear you guys saying really good stuff about them Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - William - 16-03-2009 Verr did a couple of good things here: -bitmap util -dbl tickcount -byte arrays -iocp sucks. Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Matt - 16-03-2009 He was also the very first person to release anything with seamless maps. He didn't finish it though, you had to do the rest yourself. Misunderstood optimized Verrigan's system. Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Anthony - 17-03-2009 doomteam1 Wrote:Matt Wrote:Verrigan's method is super precise. Down to the nanoseconds. Lol. It doesn't mess up the system if it loops to a negative number either.who is this Why did you press enter after who is this? Lol. Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Doomy - 17-03-2009 Anthony Wrote:Don't blame me I speak doomglishdoomteam1 Wrote:Matt Wrote:Verrigan's method is super precise. Down to the nanoseconds. Lol. It doesn't mess up the system if it loops to a negative number either.who is this Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Tony - 17-03-2009 doomteam1 Wrote:Anthony Wrote:Don't blame me I speak doomglishdoomteam1 Wrote:Matt Wrote:Verrigan's method is super precise. Down to the nanoseconds. Lol. It doesn't mess up the system if it loops to a negative number either.who is this Go to hell. Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Pbcrazy - 17-03-2009 he's doom, he's already doing that... telling him will only accelerate the process... ![]() ![]() Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Doomy - 17-03-2009 Tony Wrote:im already heredoomteam1 Wrote:Anthony Wrote:Don't blame me I speak doomglishdoomteam1 Wrote:Matt Wrote:Verrigan's method is super precise. Down to the nanoseconds. Lol. It doesn't mess up the system if it loops to a negative number either.who is this Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - JokeofWeek - 17-03-2009 Just throwing this out there ![]() viewtopic.php?f=69&t=4259 Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - Matt - 17-03-2009 JokeofWeek Wrote:Just throwing this out there I tried that first. It didn't work. Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - GIAKEN - 17-03-2009 Yeah...timeGetTime had problems for me. I think it was the timeBeginPeriod. When I tried to connect to my game, the loop at ConnectToServer would never finish. So I had to restart. I ended up just using Verrigan's method with GetSysTimeMS. It works beautifully. Re: Better GetTickCount Alternative? - JokeofWeek - 18-03-2009 No no, I was just pointing out that my tut was the same as that article ![]() |